Best Physical Modeling VST Plugins

Hello Composers, Mike here! :smiley:
I am a huge fan of physical modeling instruments, meaning VST Plugin Instruments that use advanced algorithms and synthesis to re-create “real” instruments as accurately as possible. This technology has been around for ages, but in the recent years advancements in computer power has made physical modeling take a huge leap forward!

Please share your experience on Physical Modeling Instruments you have used, and add suggestions of plugins. Here is a list I’ve compiled of all the “best” Physically Modeled Instruments as VST Plugins on the market:

List of the Best Physical Modeling VST Plugins (in the world)

  • Drums - MODO Drums
  • Bass - MODO Bass
  • Piano - Modartt Pianoteq
  • Piano - Piano V
  • Keys - V Collection
  • Acoustic Guitar - ?
  • Electric Guitar - Iron Axe
  • Strings - SWAM Strings
  • Strings - Sample Modeling Strings
  • Strings - Arché Collection
  • Brass - Sample Modeling Brass
  • Woodwinds - SWAM Solo Woodwinds

Again, please share any tips, tricks, or personal experience on Physical Modeling Instruments! :slight_smile:

I will start by sharing my top tips regarding using many of these physically modeled instruments. The main advantage imho is the incredible control over the sound, tone, expression and performance you get compared to “sample libraries”. Simply because samples are “burned in”, like a bunch of pictures (even though there are 1000s of them). While physical modeling at least tries to be more like a real instruments, meaning unlimited variation in every aspect of the sound. :smile:

My Top Tips

  • Use a Breath Controller
    It really makes a huge difference on the authenticity and expression on instruments that are naturally performed with your breath (brass and woodwinds)
  • Assign CC-faders and knobs
    Use all the added power of expression and control that comes from physical modeling, by assigning controllers to various aspects of the instrument
  • Use extra Expression Controllers
    If you have more ways of inputting (recording) expression in the performance, use them. This can be a sustain pedal, an expression pedal, or any add-on MIDI controller for expression.

Please share your own tips on using and performing physical modeling VST instruments! :slight_smile:

Sincerely,
Mike

As a BFD user , I was chewing at the bit to try MODO Drums…
Theres a Video on YT, and for me, Id buy the Plug just for the Hi Hat articulations… The way it goes from closed to open is well… fking Voodoo…
But…

PSA for Users of Computers with CPU’s pre 2011 (generally)
Im a fan of the cMP’s… Personally I have a 4.1 , flashed to 5.1, Hex core 3.46, evga 980 GPU, PCI SSD’s USB ect ect ect…
Its 10 years old, and with all the updates As a Logic User, and a Mac user, its never failed me… I did an entire Score for a feature even with its original 4 core 2.66 cpu… Though , cue by cue…

So its upon me… AVX…

So far, MODO Drums and Massive X are not viable…

Damn, its painful, just hope all these companies dont start only supporting AVX capable CPU’s…
Afterall, Most the stuff ive read, its mainly for the gui side of things…

As for Physical modelling…
Cant go wrong with Sculpture, especially for sound design…
But overall, I have the Arturia V6 collection…
No doubt, as a Suite of plugs, Arturia really have brought it.

1 Like

I’m glad to hear your studio computer lasted that long without failing you. Even though I suspect you will see more new plugins not being viable due to performance issues and not compatible. =/

MODO Drums is intriguing, I think they did a fantastic job on MODO Bass which is now my go to for all electric bass sounds. The amount of detail you can do in sound design and customizing the tone is insane! :smiley:

I believe we are at a new frontier for physical modeling. I am hoping Arturia will continue in this field too as they have a great reputation and the resources as a “bigger company in this field” to do it.

Wouldn’t it be magic If Yamaha released the VL1 as a VI…

Unless they have and ive missed it.

1 Like

Interesting SWAM demo:

For the strings, the tone and details are still not quite there, IMHO, but with “bowing mode” it starts getting real interesting…! Of course, with the right controllers, you also start entering the zone where you pretty much have to be able to play the real instrument to play the modeled one, but even so, I see incredible potential.

The saxophone and clarinet sound really impressive to me, though - but, disclaimer: I don’t play those instruments! :wink:

Really tempted to grab some of these, and try out the BBC2 + Touché combo.

1 Like

Let me ask you a philosophical question David: if a synthesized instrument doesn’t sound exactly authentic, but exceeds the original instrument in Capability for expression, range of style, tone, and every sense of playability, will it still be an inferior instrument?

To sum up: does a instrument have to sound acoustically authentic?

I have no answer myself, I’m just opening up the question :smiley:

1 Like

I think it’s a pretty complicated question, actually.

Of course, there are all these (part objective, part subjective) parameters that make a sound “good” in a musically useful way. I think part of the problem with the violin family of instruments, is that they have a pretty harsh and nasty “natural” voice, and even though a good player has a lot of control over the tone, the instrument itself still needs to strike a delicate balance of resonances to sound pleasant, even when played really well. So, it’s about the worst family of instruments to model! Ever so slightly off, and it just sounds terrible, or at best, weird. I believe this is true to some extent for all instrument one would refer to as expressive and interesting: They are balancing right on the edge of sounding horrible, like a human voice that is just on the verge of breaking up.

Another side of this is the “uncanny valley” phenomenon. I think the most obvious example of this would be human speech vs voice synthesis. “Retro style” voice synthesis, though perfectly intelligible and also musically useful, just sounds weird and alien. But, when it’s realistic enough that you can’t tell for sure if it’s a bot or a human, you start listening for other things, and unless it’s extremely realistic, it will probably come across as a creepily neurotic person, and at that point, it doesn’t really matter if the tone of the voice is however pleasant.

In short, I think it needs to sound either pleasant and musical (like more traditional synth sounds), OR both pleasant and incredibly realistic, or it will just not work. It’s basically a different flavor of the same problem we have with sample libraries: Not quite there yet, but sometimes close enough to fool most listeners when used in context, and avoiding the problem areas.

So, it’s going to be yet another while before we can fool a professional violinist with a virtual rendering of the Paganini Caprices.

And, we’re still going to need a professional… player of weird MIDI controllers, to pull that off. These are, by all means, real instruments in that regard.

1 Like